The formal announcement has been made of the Roman Catholic Church position in relation to other Churches - in effect only the Roman Catholic Church is the "real Church".
No doubt many people will spend a considerable amount of time and words interpreting the ecumenical implications of this. Others have already suggested that this marks a considerable step back to a more conservative position.
I am inclined to several much more personal reflections:
1. Can I sum up the curial position by saying " well he would say that wouldn't he". I am not sure that I expected anything different when one views the inclinations of the current Pope and the place that the curial thinking is.
2. More important is what is happening at a local level. Here in England I experience a much more liberal view. In essence what I experience is that Roman Catholics view themselves in practice as "one part of The Church" - some may see themselves as being the "true" part of the Church but they do intrinsically recognise that there are other parts. So on a day-to-day basis lay Catholics regard me as a priest in exactly the same way they might there parish priest. In the context of closer relationships priests simply ignore curial rulings and niceties.
3. I would offer my personal experience as a priest - over the years my role/status with Catholic contexts has developed as follows:
not receiving at The Public/Community Mass and not receiving at the Retreat Mass
receiving at the Retreat Mass
receiving at the Public Community Mass
Distributing at the Retreat Mass ( a Deacons role formally)
Assisting at the Retreat Mass
Preaching at a Public Community mass as an ecumenical guest
Preaching at a Public/Community Mass with no explanation and processing as a priest
Assisting as a Public/Community Mass
Concelebrating at the Retreat Mass
Hearing confessions during a Retreat
Presiding at The Mass on a retreat-day with three catholic priests and several lay Catholics present - they all recieved and regarded the celebration as "the full works".
4. So do the priests that are extending these invitations feel they are "pushing the boat out". The response from one that I spoke to this morning was that he did not see anything particular radical about it " its just a natural development which is accepted by me and mine on the journey of faith we are on together"
5. What is interesting is that my instinct is not to say where and when - because there is still the potential for causing problems for my Catholic priestly colleagues - a change of Bishop in particular can change the tone of a Diocese - and repercussions can develop years after the event.
6. This is a hallmark of real ecumenical relations between an Anglican-Catholic Priest (who would for example believe that there will be a Pope role within the united Church of Christ) and Roman Catholic priests. The differences between us are largely matters of institution or order, and the theological differences which do exist are (in a very Anglican sense) comfortably containable within a single Church. I recognised that this would not be true for all non-Catholics - but suggests that the boundaries are not denominational ones but theological ones.
7. So the above may possibly be "unusual" but it is "possible". The absolute key to developing such relationships is never ever pushing the boundaries of priestly colleagues, and accepting with complete grace the decisions which call for tighter/traditional boundaries. Friendship and mutual recognition must never be forced. Effective progressive movement has to emerge from a genuine invitation, rather than from any sense of obligation. Non-parochial settings ( retreats and teaching conferences are the most appropriate testing grounds for lay support and understanding. Most Bishops choose (very positively) to be deaf and blind to such developments.
Will the latest declaration from the Pope change the situation - we will see but I very much doubt it.
Recent Comments